What practice best protects against delay disputes?

The best practice for protecting against delay disputes is to maintain timely updates, provide clear narratives, and ensure solid records. This approach emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation and communication throughout the project lifecycle.

Regularly updating the project schedule not only keeps all stakeholders informed about the current status but also allows for early identification of potential delays. Clear narratives help contextualize the updates, providing a story behind the numbers that can clarify the reasons for any schedule changes. Solid records serve as evidence that can substantiate claims or defenses during disputes, ensuring that there is a comprehensive trail of the project’s progression and the decisions made. This combination of thorough communication and documentation creates a robust framework that enhances transparency, minimizes misunderstandings, and effectively mitigates the risks associated with project delays.

Other practices like frequent team meetings, establishing a buffer in the schedule, or reducing the scope of work might contribute to project management but do not directly address the necessary documentation and narrative clarity that are critical in resolving disputes related to delays.